1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar


Battleship Texas BB 34 by Tom Hathcock

Want to add this gigapan to your favorites? Log In or Sign Up now.

Log In now to add this Gigapan to a group gallery.

About This Gigapan

Toggle
Taken by
Tom Hathcock Tom Hathcock
Explore score
56
Size
0.06 Gigapixels
Views
1107
Date added
Mar 30, 2010
Date taken
Mar 29, 2010
Categories
 
Galleries
Competitions
Tags
Description

Battleship Texas at the San Jancinto Museum and Park located in La Porte, Texas

Stitch notes:

GigaPan Stitch version 1.0.0804 (Macintosh)
Panorama size: 60 megapixels (13760 x 4384 pixels)
Input images: 676 (52 columns by 13 rows)
Field of view: 144.7 degrees wide by 46.1 degrees high (top=33.0, bottom=-13.1)
Settings:
All default settings
Original image properties:
Camera make: NIKON CORPORATION
Camera model: NIKON D300S
Image size: 4288x2848 (12.2 megapixels)
Capture time: 2010-03-29 14:09:12 - 2010-03-29 14:51:24
Aperture: f/18
Exposure time: 0.008
ISO: 200
Focal length (35mm equiv.): 43.0 mm
Digital zoom: off
White balance: Automatic
Exposure mode: Manual
Horizontal overlap: 95.4 to 95.9 percent
Vertical overlap: 94.9 to 95.6 percent
Computer stats: 4096 MB RAM, 2 CPUs
Total time 12:39:10 (1:07 per picture)
Alignment: 25:45, Projection: 4:18, Blending: 12:09:07
(Preview finished in 12:33:28)


Gigapan Comments (3)

Toggle Minimize gigapan_comment
  1. Angelko Krstanovic

    Angelko Krstanovic (January 05, 2012, 01:00PM )

    that's a very intimidating vessel. i overlapped a lot too last weekend. i was messing with the camera and the tripod, and forgot about maxing the focal length until well into the sequence. oh well, next time :)

  2. Richard Palmer

    Richard Palmer (March 30, 2010, 06:20PM )

    With a 30-40% overlap, this panorama would have been about 4 Gigapixels! Looking at the focal length, though, shows that the pano was taken at a normal focal length instead of at a longer focal length, say 300mm. That explains the excess overlap. Twelve to 18 frames at 43 mm and 30% overlap would have covered the same area, and would stitch in about 5 minutes - at most.

  3. Jaime Brotons

    Jaime Brotons (March 30, 2010, 05:21AM )

    This image is too small for 676 shots, why did you overlap 95%?

The GigaPan EPIC Series, Purchase an GigaPan EPIC model and receive GigaPan Stitch complimentary

Where in the World is this GigaPan?

Toggle

Stitcher Notes

ToggleMinimize

GigaPan Stitch version 1.0.0804 (Macintosh)
Panorama size: 60 megapixels (13760 x 4384 pixels)
Input images: 676 (52 columns by 13 rows)
Field of view: 144.7 degrees wide by 46.1 degrees high (top=33.0, bottom=-13.1)
Settings:
All default settings
Original image properties:
Camera make: NIKON CORPORATION
Camera model: NIKON D300S
Image size: 4288x2848 (12.2 megapixels)
Capture time: 2010-03-29 14:09:12 - 2010-03-29 14:51:24
Aperture: f/18
Exposure time: 0.008
ISO: 200
Focal length (35mm equiv.): 43.0 mm
Digital zoom: off
White balance: Automatic
Exposure mode: Manual
Horizontal overlap: 95.4 to 95.9 percent
Vertical overlap: 94.9 to 95.6 percent
Computer stats: 4096 MB RAM, 2 CPUs
Total time 12:39:10 (1:07 per picture)
Alignment: 25:45, Projection: 4:18, Blending: 12:09:07
(Preview finished in 12:33:28)

Member Log In